Changing gender gap and practice patterns in reproductive endocrinology and infertility subspecialists in the United States: a Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility report.

OBJECTIVE: To identify changes in current practice patterns, salaries, and satisfaction by gender and by years in practice among board-certified reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) subspecialists in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional web-based survey including 37 questions conducted by the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were total compensation and practice patterns compared by gender and the type of practice. The secondary outcomes included demographics, the number of in vitro fertilization cycles, surgeries performed, and the morale of survey respondents. RESULT(S): There were 370 respondents (48.4% women and 51.4% men). Compared with a similar survey conducted 6 years earlier, a 27% increase in the number of female respondents was observed in this survey. There was a marginally significant trend toward lower compensation for female than male REI subspecialists (17% lower, $472,807 vs. $571,969). The gap was seen for responders with ≥10 years' experience, which is also when there was the largest gap between private and academic practice (mean $820,997 vs, $391,600). Most (77%) felt positively about the current state of the reproductive endocrinology field, and >90% would choose the subspecialty again. CONCLUSION(S): There has been a substantial increase in the number of recent female REI subspecialists showing less disparity in compensation, and the gap appears to be closing. There is an increasing gap in compensation between private and academic practices with ≥5 years of experience. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility remains a high morale specialty.

Variantes de vírus são esperadas, mas vigilância deve continuar monitorando possíveis mudanças nos padrões clínicos, dizem especialistas

Nas Américas, uma rede de laboratórios de 22 países contribui para a detecção de variantes do SARS-CoV-2. Até agora, 37 países e territórios confirmaram a presença de uma ou mais das quatro variantes de preocupação. Monitorá-las é a chave para detectar quaisquer mudanças incomuns ou inesperadas que possam afetar as medidas de controle, incluindo as vacinas

[Younger medical specialists and longer waiting time: cohort study of the duration of medical training]. / Jongere specialisten en langere wachttijd.

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends and developments in the total duration of training medical specialists in the Netherlands, including their ages upon completion of the components of medical education: undergraduate medical program, waiting time and further post-graduate specialist training. DESIGN: Population cohort study. METHOD: From the combined data from Statistics Netherlands and the Registration Committee for Medical Specialists for the period 1986 to 2018 relevant populations were selected and training trajectories were mapped. The population size was 40,604 individuals for undergraduate medical programs, 41,885 for the duration of post-graduate specialist training, 31,915 for the waiting periods and 21666 for the total duration of the trajectory from the start of medical school until registration as a specialist. RESULTS: The median duration of undergraduate medical programs was 7.1 years, which is longer than the nominal duration and this remained unchanged over the observation period. The average waiting time between graduating medical school and postgraduate specialist training has increased from 2010 onwards to 3.7 years in 2018. The average duration of postgraduate specialist training is increasing. The average age at graduation of medical school fell by 1.7 years to 26.1. The average age at the start of post-graduate specialist training decreased, as did the average age at registration as a specialist. CONCLUSION: The total duration of training of medical specialists is stable. Changes such as "dedicated transition year" and flexible arrangements for postgraduate training have had no discernible influence on the total duration of medical training. Because the average age at start of postgraduate specialist training has decreased, medical specialists are on average younger upon registration.

Uveitis Specialists Harnessing Disruptive Technology during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.

Spurred by the coronavirus disease pandemic and shortage of eye care providers, telemedicine is transforming the way ophthalmologists care for their patients. Video conferencing, ophthalmic imaging, hybrid visits, intraocular inflammation quantification, and portable technology are evolving areas that may allow more uveitis patients to be evaluated via telemedicine. Despite these promising disruptive technologies, there remain significant technological limitations, legal barriers, variable insurance coverage for virtual visits, and lack of clinical trials for uveitis specialists to embrace telemedicine.

Las unidades de educación médica en las facultades de Medicina y de Ciencias de la Salud en España. ¿Son necesarias? / Medical education units in Medical and Health Sciences schools in Spain. Are they needed?

En una mayoría de países, la educación médica es una especialidad médica más y preside la vida académica en el grado, el posgrado y en la formación continuada. Pero la situación en España es muy mejorable. Aunque existe un creciente interés en la educación médica como disciplina o especialidad, la mayor parte de las facultades de Medicina españolas no disponen de una unidad o departamento de educación médica que se encargue del avance de la disciplina. Algunas facultades han dispuesto una unidad, cátedra, departamento o centro de estudios, adscrita o independiente a la dirección del centro, a veces sin relación orgánica alguna con el proceso de formación. En este artículo describiremos por qué creemos que estas estructuras son necesarias, su utilidad, así como sus funciones y el alcance de sus actividades. Analizaremos la situación actual en España con el ánimo de promocionar la creación de estas estructuras en todas las facultades de Medicina. Igualmente, repasaremos los mecanismos de los que se ha dotado a la formación especializada en el posgrado para dar respuestas a sus necesidades de formación

In a majority of countries, medical education is one more medical specialty and presides over academic life in undergraduate, graduate and continuing education. But, the situation in Spain is very improvable. Although there is a growing interest in medical education as a discipline or specialty, most of the Spanish faculties of Medicine do not have a unit or department of medical education, which is in charge of advancing the discipline. Some faculties have arranged a unit, chair, department or study center, attached or independent to the management of the center, sometimes without any organic relationship to the training process. In this article we will describe why we believe these structures are necessary, their usefulness, as well as their functions and the scope of their activities. We will analyze the current situation in Spain with the aim of promoting the creation of these structures in all the faculties of Medicine. We will also review the mechanisms that specialized postgraduate training has been equipped to provide answers to their training needs

Development of the professional role of diabetes nurses in specialised diabetes and primary care in Catalonia / Desarrollo del rol profesional de la enfermera en diabetes en Cataluña en atención especializada y en atención primaria

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe therapeutic education programmes in diabetes in Catalonia and the differences according to the healthcare setting in which the patients are attended (primary care [PC] and specialised diabetes care [SDC]). METHOD: We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional, comparative study of diabetes nurses (DN) in SDC and PC in Catalonia. The sample was obtained from all the DN in SDC and a randomised cluster sample of DN in PC. The questionnaire of the Study of European Nurses in Diabetes (SEND) validated in Spanish was used. RESULTS: A total of 287 questionnaires were analysed (24.3% SDC and 75.6% PC). More training in diabetes through masters, postgraduate courses and continuing education was observed in SDC (p < 0.001) as well as structured, written, education programmes and the combination of individual and group education strategies (p < 0.05). The roles of educator, consultant, researcher, manager, liaison or collaborator and innovator and the telematic follow-up of patients was also more developed in SDC (p < 0.05). The grade of work satisfaction was elevated in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Nursing professionals in SDC assume more roles of specialised clinical nursing and also have more training in diabetes and therapeutic education than PC professionals. (2) Professionals in SDC work with a greater proportion of structured diabetes therapeutic education programmes although this should improve in both settings. According to the results obtained and the scientific evidence currently available, the training of DN working in the care of people with diabetes should be accredited in order to increase the use of structured programmes and investigation by DNs in both healthcare settings

OBJETIVOS: Describir la educación terapéutica en diabetes en Cataluña y las diferencias según el ámbito asistencial donde esta se imparte (asistencia primaria [AP] y asistencia especializada [AE]). MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y comparativo en PE de AE y de AP en Cataluña. La muestra se obtuvo a partir de todos los PE de AE y una muestra aleatoria por conglomerados de PE de AP. Se utilizó el cuestionario del Study of European Nurses in Diabetes validado al español. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 287 cuestionarios (24,3% AE y 75,6% AP). Se observó más formación en diabetes a nivel de máster, posgrado y formación continuada en AE (p < 0,001). Más programas de educación estructurada, escritos y que combinan las estrategias de educación individual y grupal en AE (p < 0,05). Los roles educador, asesor, investigador, director, colaborador e innovador así como el seguimiento de pacientes vía telemática están más desarrollados en AE (p < 0,05). En ambos grupos el grado de satisfacción laboral es elevado. CONCLUSIONES: 1) Los profesionales de enfermería de AE asumen más roles de enfermera clínica especialista, además de tener más formación en diabetes y educación terapéutica que los profesionales de AP. 2) En AE se trabaja en mayor proporción con programas de ETD estructurados pero en ambos ámbitos se debería mejorar. De acuerdo con los resultados obtenidos y la evidencia científica disponible sería necesario acreditar la formación de los PE que trabajan en la atención de personas con diabetes, aumentar la utilización de programas estructurados y la investigación propia en ambos ámbitos de asistencia

Online Ratings for Vascular Interventional Proceduralists Vary by Physician Specialty.

BACKGROUND: Multiple specialties offer vascular interventional care, creating potential competition for referrals and procedures. At the same time, patient/consumer ratings have become more impactful for physicians who perform vascular procedures. We hypothesized that there are differences in online ratings based on specialty. METHODS: We used official program lists from the Association for Graduate Medical Education to identify institutions with training programs in integrated vascular surgery (VS), integrated interventional radiology (IR), and interventional cardiology (IC). Faculty providers were identified in each specialty at these institutions. A standardized search was performed to collect online ratings from Vitals.com, Healthgrades.com, and Google.com as well as from online demographics. Between specialty differences were analyzed using chi-squared and analysis of variance tests as appropriate. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with review volume and star rating. RESULTS: A total of 1,330 providers (n = 454 VS, n = 451 IR, n = 425 IC) were identified across 47 institutions in 27 states. VS (55.5%-69.4%) and IC (63.8%-71.1%) providers were significantly more likely to have reviews than IR (28.6%-48.8%) providers across all online platforms (P < 0.001 for all websites). Across all platforms, IC providers were rated significantly higher than VS and IR providers. Multivariable regression showed that provider specialty and additional time in practice were associated with higher review volume. In addition to specialty, review volume was associated with star rating as those physicians with more reviews tended to have a higher rating. CONCLUSIONS: On average, vascular surgeons have more reviews and are more highly rated than interventional radiologists but tend to have fewer reviews and lower ratings than interventional cardiologists. VS providers may benefit from encouraging patients to file online reviews, especially in competitive markets.

Prevalence of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Drug Dispensing Patterns Among Medicaid and Medicaid-Medicare Dually Eligible Beneficiaries in Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Puerto Rico, to describe disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) dispensing patterns by prescriber specialty, and to illustrate the impact of RA case definition on the estimated prevalence. METHODS: This study estimated the prevalence of RA in Puerto Rico during 2016 among Medicaid and Medicaid-Medicare dually eligible beneficiaries of the Mi Salud health care plan, a federally funded health insurance program. DMARD dispensing and cost patterns were described and stratified by provider specialty. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of RA case definition on estimated prevalence. RESULTS: The prevalence of RA in 2016 was estimated to be 2 cases per 1,000 beneficiaries, with 3 per 1,000 beneficiaries among females, 4.5 times that of males. In total, 44% of beneficiaries received conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) only, 32% received biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) only, and 24% received a combination of csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs. Rheumatologists and a combination of specialties accounted for the highest median number of dispensed DMARDs, with 14 each. A sensitivity analysis revealed that when RA cases with ≥3 medical claims were restricted to having ≥1 DMARD claim, the estimated prevalence changed from 6 to 3 cases per 1,000 beneficiaries. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RA in Puerto Rico in this study is lower than reported in the mainland US, possibly due to more stringent criteria to define RA. DMARD dispensing and cost patterns are similar to those found in other studies. Claims algorithms that identify RA have higher validity when pharmacy data is included.

La especialidad de Medicina Legal y Forense en España: La consolidación por el sistema de residencia / Legal and Forensic Medicine Specialty in Spain: the consolidation by the medical residency system

No disponible

Genética en la cardiopatía congénita: ¿estamos preparados? / Genetics in congenital heart disease. Are we ready for it?

En los últimos años, la genética ha adquirido merecidamente un lugar importante en casi todas las disciplinas médicas, y este también es el caso en el campo de las cardiopatías congénitas. Esto no solo ha llevado a una mejor comprensión de la fisiopatología de los defectos cardiacos congénitos, sino que también conlleva un impacto positivo en el tratamiento del paciente. La integración de la genética clínica en centros acreditados para el abordaje de las cardiopatías congénitas es sin duda una recomendación clara. Los cardiólogos pediátricos y de adultos tienen un papel crucial en el proceso de evaluación genética de los pacientes y sus familias, por lo que deben conocer las señales de alerta que justifiquen un estudio genético más o menos elaborado, así como el asesoramiento y la realización de otras pruebas. Para la correcta interpretación de los resultados de las pruebas genéticas, es esencial disponer de algunos conocimientos básicos. En este documento de revisión se proporciona una visión general práctica de lo que implica la evaluación genética, qué tipo de pruebas genéticas son posibles hoy y cómo se aplican al paciente individual en la práctica clínica

Genetics has rightly acquired an important place in almost all medical disciplines in recent years and this is certainly the case in the field of congenital cardiology. Not only has this led to greater insight into the pathophysiology of congenital heart defects but it also has a beneficial impact on patient management. Integration of clinical genetics in multidisciplinary centers of expertise for CHD is therefore a clear recommendation. Adult and pediatric cardiologists play a crucial role in the process of genetic evaluation of patients and families and should have be familiar with red flags for referral for further clinical genetic elaboration, counseling, and eventual testing. Some basic knowledge is also important for the correct interpretation of genetic testing results. In this review article, we provide a practical overview of what genetic evaluation entails, which type of genetic tests are possible today, and how this can be used in practice for the individual patient

Contributions, Aspirations, and Challenges of Academic Specialist Divisions in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Shortly after its inception, the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology recognized that no data described the composition and faculty activities of "academic generalist divisions." Consequently, in 2018, the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology appointed a presidential task force and conducted the current surveys of chairs and division directors and key informant interviews to understand the composition and faculty activities in divisions of academic specialists in departments of obstetrics and gynecology and propose criteria for excellence in each mission area to guide development of divisions. In 2014, with Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology's guidance, these divisions were referred to as academic specialists divisions and the faculty within as academic specialists to emphasize that they provide specialized women's health care in academic settings. The divisions comprised approximately 30% of departments' full-time faculty (median 12). In 27% of the departments, these divisions contributed more than half of departmental revenue, and 49% contributed 26-50%. Nearly 90% of divisions provided a sizeable proportion of the department's total teaching efforts. Compensation relied more on clinical productivity than on seniority, quality, academic contributions, or academic rank. Subsequently, five performance domains were identified to help divisions define divisional excellence: clinical, education, research, service & advocacy, and academic environment. Furthermore, excellent divisions were characterized as those with outstanding clinicians and educators who emphasize scholarly productivity. Although academic specialists contribute significantly to their departments' financial, clinical, and educational productivity, many have limited opportunities for scholarly activity. Achieving divisional excellence likely will depend on the ability to recruit and retain faculty with career expectations that align with the division's prioritized performance domains.

Medicina de familia, la invención colectiva / Family medicine, the collective invention

No disponible

Cardiopatías congénitas del adulto en España: situación actual y perspectivas futuras / Adult congenital heart disease in Spain: present situation and future perspectives

No disponible

Cardiopatías congénitas del adulto en España: estructura, actividad y características clínicas / Adult congenital heart disease in Spain: health care structure and activity, and clinical characteristics

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Analizar la estructura asistencial y las características clínicas de las cardiopatías congénitas del adulto en España. MÉTODOS: En 2014 se realizó una encuesta entre 32 centros que se clasificaron como nivel 1 o 2 en función de su estructura asistencial. En 2017 se realizó un registro clínico de todos los pacientes asistidos consecutivamente en cada centro durante un periodo de 2 meses. RESULTADOS: Un total de 31 centros (97%) respondieron la encuesta. Se excluyó a 7 por no disponer de consulta especializada. Hasta el año 2005 solo había 5 centros con dedicación específica, pero en 2014 había 10 centros de nivel 1 y 14 de nivel 2 con un total de 19.373 pacientes en seguimiento. La estructura institucional era completa en la mayoría de los centros, pero solo el 33% disponía de enfermería propia y el 29%, de unidad de transición estructurada. La actividad terapéutica específica supuso el 99 y el 91% de la publicada en los registros nacionales de cirugía y cateterismo terapéutico. Del total, el 44% de los pacientes tenían cardiopatía de complejidad moderada y el 24%, de gran complejidad. Aunque el 46% de los pacientes atendidos en centros de nivel 2 tenían cardiopatías simples, el 17% eran cardiopatías de gran complejidad. CONCLUSIONES: La estructura y la actividad de los centros españoles cumplen las recomendaciones internacionales y son comparables a las de otros países desarrollados. El espectro de cardiopatías en seguimiento muestra una concentración de lesiones de complejidad moderada y gran complejidad incluso en centros de nivel 2. Sería aconsejable reordenar el seguimiento de los pacientes en función de las recomendaciones internacionales

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the structure of health care delivery and the clinical characteristics of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) attending specialized centers in Spain. METHODS: A survey was conducted among 32 Spanish centers in 2014. The centers were classified into 2 levels based on their resources. In 2017, a clinical dataset was collected of all consecutive patients attended for a 2-month period at these centers. RESULTS: A total of 31 centers (97%) completed the survey. Seven centers without specialized ACHD clinics were excluded from the analysis. In 2005, only 5 centers met the requirements for specific care. In 2014, there were 10 level 1 and 14 level 2 centers, with a total of 19 373 patients under follow-up. Health care structure was complete in most centers but only 33% had ACHD nurse specialists on staff and 29% had structured transition programs. Therapeutic procedures accounted for 99% and 91% of those reported by National Registries of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiac Catheterization, respectively. Among attended patients, 48% had moderately complex lesions and 24% had highly complex lesions. Although 46% of patients attending level 2 centers had simple lesions, 17% had complex lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The structure for ACHD health care delivery in Spain complies with international recommendations and is similar to that of other developed countries. Congenital heart diseases under specialized care consist mostly of moderately and highly complex lesions, even in level 2 centers. It would be desirable to reorganize patient follow-up according to international recommendations in clinical practice

Los desafíos de la formación de residentes de radiología en América Latina ¿Cuáles son las causas subyacentes? ¿Cómo podemos ayudar? / The challenges of radiology resident training in latin america. What are the root causes? How we can help?

No disponible